How abolishing higher-rate pension tax relief would affect savers

Tom Selby
10 February 2020

•    Reports over the weekend suggest the Treasury is once again considering scrapping higher-rate pension tax relief
•    A 30-year old higher-rate taxpayer saving £500 a month could end up with a pension worth £140,000 less if pension tax relief is limited to the basic-rate (20%)
•    Additional-rate taxpayers would face an even bigger hit to their retirement pots under the plans
•    Reform would also risk exacerbating intergenerational unfairness as younger savers would be unable to access higher and additional-rate relief

Tom Selby, senior analyst at AJ Bell, comments: 

“While the Treasury has been guilty of crying wolf on countless occasions on pension tax relief reform, it is clear there are people within Number 11 who want to slash and burn retirement saving incentives. 

“Reports over the weekend suggest the nuclear option of scrapping higher-rate pension tax relief altogether – and saving an estimated £10 billion in the process – is once again under consideration. This would have a significant impact not only on the pension outcomes of over 4 million higher and additional-rate taxpayers, but of those who may become higher earners in later life.

“A 30-year-old higher-rate taxpayer saving £500 a month in a pension could end up with a fund worth £140,000 less by the time they reach age 65 if tax relief is limited to the basic-rate. If the extra relief wasn’t invested in a pension they could be over £50,000 worse off over the course of 35 years.

“It’s worth noting a significant chunk of the circa £35 billion in pension tax and National Insurance relief costs incurred by the Treasury each year goes to defined benefit schemes, most of which are in the public sector. The Government would therefore inevitably have a significant battle on its hands with representatives of these workers, including those working in the NHS, if it decided to scrap higher-rate relief.

“There are also intergenerational issues to consider. Younger workers are more likely to be basic-rate taxpayers, with most enjoying their highest wages in the later stages of their careers. If tax relief were to be limited at 20%, young people - who have already missed out on cheap housing and generous defined benefit provision – would be unable to claim the extra tax relief bonus that was available to their parents.”

Lost pension tax relief if it is limited to basic rate (20%)

Age savings start

£1000 per month until age 65 (no investment growth)

£1,000 per month until age 65 (5% investment growth)

Higher-rate taxpayer

   

30

£105,000

£284,509

40

£75,000

£150,340

50

£45,000

£67,972

 

 

 

Additional-rate taxpayer

 

 

30

£131,250

£355,636

40

£93,750

£187,925

50

£56,250

£84,966

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

£500 per month until age 65 (no investment growth)

£500 per month until age 65 (5% investment growth)

Higher-rate taxpayer

 

 

30

£52,500

£142,254

40

£37,500

£75,170

50

£22,500

£33,986

 

 

 

Additional-rate taxpayer

 

 

30

£65,625

£177,818

40

£46,875

£93,963

50

£28,125

£42,483

Tom Selby
Director of Public Policy

Tom is director of public policy at AJ Bell. He is a prominent spokesperson on retirement issues and his views are regularly sought by national print and broadcast media. Tom has successfully campaigned for a number of consumer-focused reforms, including banning pensions cold-calling and increasing pensions allowances, and he is passionate about improving outcomes for savers and retirees. Tom joined AJ Bell as senior analyst in April 2016, having previously spent seven years as a financial journalist. He has a degree in Economics from Newcastle University.

Contact details

Mobile: 07702 858 234
Email: tom.selby@ajbell.co.uk

Follow us: